WebSee Page 1. In Bhagwan Swarup v State of Rajasthan,105 the first accused (A-1) was the son of the second accused (A-2). A-1 was married to the deceased. A-2, father-in-law of the deceased, was a retired government servant and a practising lawyer. The relations between A-1 and his wife were strained. One day, the deceased was found dead in her room. WebJan 23, 2003 · Bhagwan Singh & Ors Vs. State of M.P [2003] INSC 19 (23 January 2003) 2003 Latest Caselaw 19 SC Citation : 2003 Latest Caselaw 19 SC Judgement Date : Jan/2003 Download as PDF CrPC Section 161. Examination of witnesses by police CrPC Section 313. Power to examine the accused Gwalior Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
Bhagwan Singh v State of Punjab on 13 May 1994 - Judgement
WebDec 20, 2024 · The appellant Virsa Singh was reportedly guilty of the murder of the Khem Singh. The appellant was then sentenced to life imprisonment under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, (Section 302). There was only one injury on the body of the person, which was inflicted by a thrusting spear. WebMay 8, 1992 · Bhagwan Singh & ANR Vs. State of Punjab [1992] INSC 148 (8 May 1992) ... CITATION: 1992 AIR 1689 1992 SCR (3) 180 1992 SCC (3) 249 JT 1992 (3) 216 1992 SCALE (1)1274. ACT: Indian Penal Code: Sections 34, 201, 302, 323, 364 and 365-Custodial death-Disappearance of dead body-Whether raises doubt about complicity of accused. lvw liverpool
Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act - iPleaders
WebState of Haryana Judgment Dated 04-12-1996 of High Court of Punjab and Haryana having citation 1997 (1) SCT 744 (P&H) , LQ/PunjHC/1996/1557 , include bench Judge HON'BLE … WebBhagwan Singh Vs. The State Of Punjab [1952] INSC 25 (30 April 1952) 1952 Latest Caselaw 25 SC. Citation : 1952 Latest Caselaw 25 SC. Judgement Date : 30 Apr 1952. Download as … WebApr 25, 2024 · Bachan Singh v State of Punjab. A five-Judge Bench of the SC upheld the constitutional validity of the death penalty as an alternative punishment for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The Court stated that Section 302 did not violate Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution. However, the Court clarified that it was ... lvwitとは